In conclusion, the plaintiff failed to substantiate their situation, plus the results of the Trial Court along with the Appellate Court docket were perceived as flawed and perverse. The petitioner sought the cancellation of a tender for putting in water supply on lands allegedly belonging to him and his forefathers. https://remingtonnfgqw.pages10.com/the-single-best-strategy-to-use-for-co-ownership-and-partition-advocate-in-karachi-near-me-66783177